I don’t use Uber, but my children do – regularly. The younger one particular, a journalist, often makes her 6 a. m. workday start time by climbing into an Uber car in Brooklyn from around 5: 30.
Do I want someone in authority to know some thing about the person driving her vehicle? You bet I do. And do I want that car to be insured 24/7? Also.
This doesn’t make me an old fogey, at least by New York City taxi standards. For more info regarding Uber Clone look at our web site.
I am just very much in favor of deregulating the business, a procedure usually called “disruption” these days. A lot of cities could stand to have their particular current taxi systems disrupted.
However, not all disruption is equally meritorious. The Mafia does business inside a disruptive manner too, but I will not invest in it if it ever decides to go public.
A lot of high-profile startups these days are taking illegal shortcuts in the name of “disruption. ” Airbnb will switch the apartment next door to yours into a hotel – a hotel that doesn’t comply with zoning, safety, consumer protection or tax laws, which is. (Do you think most Airbnb flats have a sign on the door pointing the way to the fire exits? I no longer. ) Not only do such arrangements create hazards to customers, they compete unfairly with businesses that do adhere to the law. And the company has faced a host of legal challenges in various towns in consequence. Airbnb will need to possibly evolve to address these concerns, or even it will eventually fold.
Uber, along with the competitors like Lyft, will face a similar challenge in the next few years. Individuals companies’ success has demonstrated there exists a real demand for their services. Yet as the law begins to catch up, Uber will have to prove that it can meet that demand within the legal framework of the areas where it operates.
Broward County, Florida, struck a sensible balance this spring. The county passed an ordinance allowing Uber to use as many cars as it pleases, and to charge any fares it desires, in contrast to the regular taxicabs and their regulated meters. But the county furthermore required registration, fingerprinting and background checks for Uber drivers, and day to day insurance for their vehicles. It sounds affordable to me.
Uber disagrees, however , which goes to show how exploitive Uber’s current business model is. The company has vulnerable to leave Broward County when the laws are not changed. It has currently pulled out of locations including San Antonio, Anchorage, and Portland, Oregon due to disputes over its business operation.
In a similar vein, Ca regulators sided with an Uber car owner who said she was really a worker, though the company considered her, like all of its drivers, an independent service provider. Though the ruling only affects the driver in question, it may open the door to other legal complaints by drivers who feel the company is treating all of them unfairly.
If Uber merely acted as an app-shaped bulletin board for hailing cars, its position might have merit. But since the company also collects all the customer fares (via cellphones), takes its cut and remits transaction to the drivers, it acts no differently than the Yellow Cab company I use in Fort Lauderdale when I swipe my card through its in-car machine. While it’s understandable that Uber might prefer to classify its drivers as independent contractors, this cannot simply choose to do so while ignoring the reality of the way in which it needs its workers to operate.
The differences between Uber and traditional cabs are usually narrowing. I don’t have to wait on the street or call a dispatcher once i want a Yellow Cab in Fort Lauderdale. I can hail a car via an app – just like Uber. Yet my Yellow Cab will have the registered driver and 24/7 insurance coverage. The only distinction I can see is within the pricing, and I don’t think that makes a difference in determining the driver’s employment status.